Jones Flagship - 2011

/images/brands/jones/logo/jones_logo.gif

Despite having similar aesthetics to the Experience, Jeremy’s pro model at Rossignol, Jeremy is keen to stress that the Flagship is the evolution of his work at Rossignol, the next step. Blunted tips and tails reduce the effect of drag in fresh snow, directional Camrock helps cut down the risk of catching an edge and makes initiating turns at slower speeds a piece of pie. Convinced that full Magnetraction edges were too aggressive for smooth riding, Jeremy has pioneered Mellow Mag, providing the extra grip in the case of an emergency, Carbon & Kevlar reinforcement reduces chatter and provides the guts for stomping monster cliff drops. Jeremy is also the founder of the POW (Protect Our Winters) charity, you can rest assured a huge amount of time and effort have gone into creating a sustainable and green option for big mountain shredders, the Flagship leads by example in this department.

Manufacturer's Description:

The premier big mountain weapon.Ideal for speed, stability, stomping airs, charging down the mountain. The apex of 25 years of freeriding experience, rigorous testing, and the latest construction technologies, the Flagship is a battle proven weapon for all-mountain attacks. The Flagship combines Magne-Traction, directional rocker and camber underfoot for the highest overall performance in even the most demanding terrain and conditions.

Jeremy Jones’ Thoughts:- Stepping into the mountains you never know what you’re going to encounter. The first two turns may be waist deep followed by ice through the crux and chop in the outrun. The Flagship is my go-to board for fast and confident freeriding in any conditions. I have designed this board with directional rocker and a blunted nose to keep the tip up in the deepest of snow, camber underfoot and Magne-Traction for edging on ice, a longer radius sidecut for speed and railing turns, a shortened running length for maneuverability in tight spaces, and a freestyle tail to land switch in powder. This board has no speed limit and no boundaries. This is the Flagship of our line and my life’s work - the ultimate freeride board. Don’t be surprised if you find yourself thanking this board at the bottom of a line.

Recommended for freeride riding.

Recommended for big mountain riding.

High cost $

Available in MidWide.

Rocker Construction.

Freeride Specific.

Green or Eco Friendly Construction.

Year: 2011

Available Lengths (cm):
158, 161, 164, 162W, 168W

Riding Style: Freeride

Specifications:

Full FSC sourced Poplar and Beech wood core
Wood Veneer Topsheet
Reclaimed Hickory Wood sidewalls
High Grade recycled sintered base
Directional Camrock rocker
Blunted Nose and Tail
Mellow Magnetraction
Carbon & Kevlar Reinforcement

Similar boards: Rossignol Experience MagTek - 2011 Never Summer Raptor & Raptor X - 2011 Nitro Pantera LX - 2011 Compatriot Commissioner - 2011 Salomon Burner - 2011

Jones Flagship Pro Snowboard 2026 size 158 | Bamboo
Jones
$719.96
(20% off)
Jones Flagship Wide Snowboard 2022
Jones
$649.95
Jones Flagship Snowboard 2026 size 172 | Bamboo
Jones
$599.96
(20% off)
Jones Flagship

Snowboard Review:

It wouldn’t be right to test the Flagship without a healthy helping of powder.. although the weather on the board test was nothing less than consistently appalling, we did have the benefit of a Wednesday evening dump. The car park was filling up as we arrived at Kaunertal, boots laced up and tight… check… liftpass… check… goggles and gloves… yep. I was all sorted, so I ran down to the TSA tent and pounced on the Jones Flagship. Jeremy and Nidecker deserve some serious credit for producing such a cool looking board, the untreated wood veneer topsheet and Hickory hard wood sidewalls just ooze class. After hurriedly mounting my bindings I ran to the gondola and peered though the windows at the infinite lines below.

Strapping into the Flagship, you immediately notice how setback the stance is, how the nose of the board is relatively stiff and the tail although still firm is little bit softer. Tight turns felt easy to initiate and grip was impressive even on harder conditions, I really enjoyed the transition between edges… this board loves being turned. So the Jones Flagship likes being turned, but it’s also a board that Jeremy and his Jones team mates use when they’re turning up the speed to eleven. As soon as I released the reigns and started charging, the Flagship was in it’s element. Straight lining steep terrain was a bit of a doddle and in the pow I felt like I was flying. As I mentioned before, I was testing the flagship on 12 inches of fresh heavy snow. The rockered nose worked well, staying catch free with absolutely no worry about going over the handlebars or sub-marining, even in the afternoon when the snow was tracked and choppy. So you’ll hear lots of reasons for using Camrock, sure it helps with float and helps with straight line confidence, for me the main reason for Camrock is to make the board more agile regardless of the boards stiffness. If the Flagship was like Jeremy’s old cambered decks on Rossi, then I’m sure it would be a bit of a handful, but it isn’t at all. I really believe that if you can carve, then you’ll get on with the Flagship.

I’ve got to give Jeremy credit for the Flagship. The Flagship is agile, the Camrock works brilliantly to help even inexperienced riders initiate tight turns super easily and the slight Magnetraction and firm torsional flex holds carves like a vice. When you crank up the speed the firm flex and camber between the bindings means the Flagship holds long carves well and when the snow gets choppy the nose rises up and the board is damp enough to deal with those unwanted vibrations. One of the best qualities of the Flagship was that it stomped powder landings on command… although I won’t be dropping any 40ft Jeremy Jones size cliffs in the near future, the Flagship certainly goes some way to explaining how the living legend does it.

Posted by Rich Ewbank in • Jones

User Snowboard Reviews

Want some advice, or have a question about the Jones Flagship snowboard, or whether it is right for you? DON'T POST HERE! Head over to our snowboard forums and our community will be happy to help.

Seriously - READ THE ABOVE..., the snowboard forum the best way to get your question seen by all of our community and an answer, rather than just those who happen to view this page.

However, if you have ridden this snowboard and want to share your feedback, then please add your experience below. It helps to add as much detail as possible, e.g board length you used, bindings, rider stats etc.

Post a review of this snowboard:

Remember my personal information?
Notify me of follow-ups to this snowboard review?

Rico on June 12, 2010 at 09:29 PM

Hey Rich, great review! I have a question, how is riding switch on this board?

Rich on June 13, 2010 at 11:54 PM

Thanks for the feedback Rico, glad you found the review useful. Actually the Flagship isn’t as limited switch as a lot of freeride powder boards. Obviously the Flagship is really directional so you probably won’t be wanting to hit kickers or land switch, but for switch traverses and little bursts backwards when the line you’ve chosen dictates then the Flagship is fine. The Flagship is pretty much for going forwards.

Brett on September 01, 2010 at 06:03 AM

Rich, Nice review. What size did you ride?  Also, how did the base look?  Nidecker quality I assume? Thx B

Rich Ewbank on September 01, 2010 at 03:05 PM

Hi Brett,

I rode the 162… which strangely doesn’t exist! Must have been a pre-production size. To be honest I’d have been happier on the 164, I loved the 62 but I’m started to get addicted to riding longer and longer boards. I’ll be riding a Rad-Air 2m Ltd edition Tanker in no time!

The bases were quality, usual high grade Nidecker sintered bases. Think Ultralite and Megalite quality… slick!

Brett on September 02, 2010 at 06:28 AM

Thank you sir! looking forward to snagging a 164 for the backside of Vail and Panoramic lift terrain at Winter park..

mark on September 10, 2010 at 01:47 AM

Hey Rich, did you notice much of a difference between this and the Rossignol Experience?

B on September 12, 2010 at 01:09 AM

Rich, What bindings did you run wiht this deck?

zoryfl on September 12, 2010 at 01:48 PM

I’m not exactly sure but in case Rich used his own bindings, I think a pair of Drake Czar.

Rich Ewbank on September 13, 2010 at 03:06 PM

Hi Folks,

Sorry for the late reply, been in the South West of France, attempting to surf. If you want a tricky knackering sport, surfing is the past-time for you. Anyway; bindings, yep Tobi is right my setup usually has Drake Czars bolted on, they seem to offer enough response for freeriding and aren’t too stiff for freestyling. I always ride with the same bindings, too many variables can effect the feel of the boards. Secondly, I haven’t ridden the Experience, Tom our chief tester has. From aesthetics they are almost identical. Riding wize I belive the Experience is a touch more aggresive, with full Mag edges instead of Jeremy’s Mellow Mag. Then comparing AmpTek with Camrock, Amptek tends to have a touch more camber between the bindings. I also hear the flex is little stiffer than the Flagship. Saying that, the Flagship provides all the spec and performance you’re ever going to need. Both stunning rides.

mark on September 23, 2010 at 10:07 PM

Hey Rich- what’s your height/weight?

Page 1 of 9.  1 2 3 >  Last ›