Snowboard Review Logo
DC

DC MLF Iikka - 2010

Summary:

Essentially the Iikka is the same snowboard as the the DC MLF, with a lick of paint. Designed to take on every feature in the park, Triaxial glass has been used for improved response, but the Focus Axis flex profile and negatively profiled core between the bindings softens up the Ikka so you still get the buttery feel of a park board on rails and boxes. Don’t forget the high speed 7200 grade sintered base, a bit of a rarity on park boards these days.

Manufacturer's Description:

Created especially by Iikka, for Iikka. We took the MLF series Twin Tp and updated it with custom silk screen graphics and a full die-cut 7200 Sintered Supreme base. Iikka’s 154 MLF withh Radius to Flat allows him the versatility to use one board for every riding situation that comes his way.

DC MLF Iikka

Year: 2010

Available Lengths (cm): 154

Riding Style: Freestyle/Park

Specifications:

True Twin Shape
Focus Axis - 6.5 (negative core profile)
Seven Radius Sidecut (7 blended radii)
Radius to flat (flat kick tip and tail)
Aeron core (lightweight laminated Aspen)
Triaxial woven glass
7200 Sintered Supreme Base
Centered stance

Similar boards:

Prospect Passage - 2010

Forum Substance (Peter Line) - 2010

Arbor Westmark - 2010

What we reckon:

Recommended for park riding Recommended for halfpipe riding Recommended for rail riding High cost snowboard Camber construction Twin shape

Read our pro guide to buying a park snowboard.

Read our pro guide to buying a rails snowboard.

Read our pro guide to buying a pipe snowboard.

Posted by Rich Ewbank in • DC

User Reviews

Want some advice, or have a question about this snowboard? Head over to our snowboard forums and our community will be happy to help.

Ridden this snowboard and want to share your feedback? Please add your experiences below. Add as much detail as possible, e.g board length, bindings, rider stats etc.

Post a review of this snowboard

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: